My name is Cosmo Lee. I run a heavy metal blog called Invisible Oranges. Believe it or not, not only is heavy metal music, it can also be quite musical. Some of metal's greatest singers are some of rock music's greatest singers. I have been following Claudia's blog with great interest, since her sage advice applies to singers of all types - including metal ones.
I wondered what she would think of some of metal's most celebrated singers. So I gave Claudia a selection of five songs with no titles or any other identification. They represent five male singers who have been working for decades and have earned the title "classic" in metal. (Ironically, the one with the longest career in metal, #4, was the one whose longevity Claudia questioned.) Her reactions are below.
Iron Maiden - “The Number of the Beast” (1982)
Singer: Bruce Dickinson
I have nothing but admiration for this singer. Listen how he starts off with a soft growl, then moves seamlessly into a well-supported, sustained high full-voice sound that then evolves into an effortless long scream! His diction is easily intelligible, regardless of the range he's singing in or the effect he's going for. He achieves an intensely rhythmic delivery of the lyrics without losing legato and musical momentum, something a lot of classical singers struggle with, especially when interpreting the many staccato and accent markings that crowd scores by Bellini, Donizetti etc.
A couple of observations for my classical readers:
- There is a visceral dramatic intensity driving this singing. Many rock and metal singers are tenors who sustain much higher, much longer than operatic tenors are ever required to. It's not just the microphone that makes this possible. These guys are singing their guts out with incredible commitment. Intention is a very powerful thing.
- Notice the rasp that occasionally colors his sound. This is an effect that is totally distinct from strain - his entire larynx and throat needs to be completely loose and free to respond this way. In some of the following examples, you'll hear singers deliberately making their voice more shallow, shrill, nasal or "harsh". If they know what they're doing, they can set up all of these effects without creating resistance and strain. You can tell the difference in much the same way you would listen to a classical singer – free singing is like a massage, while entangled singing makes you sympathetically tighten up your own throat.
Black Sabbath - "Falling Off the Edge of the World" (1981)
Singer: Ronnie James Dio
Falling Off the Edge of the World
This is another very fine singer. His voice is so naturally resonant–he reminds me of Freddy Mercury. Like the first singer, he performs with perfect legato, clear diction, and a consistent, organic vibrancy. He arranges his resonance space to create a shallow snarl without setting up any resistance for his breath. You can tell how healthy his delivery is from the way he moves in and out of brief moments of harmony with the other tracks with impeccable intonation.
Mercyful Fate - "Gypsy" (1984)
Singer: King Diamond
Here is some impressively artful singing. He begins in full-voice tenor fraught with sobbing verismo-like ornaments and then wails in an ultra-high, very focused countertenor, alternating these two approaches throughout the song, at times even within the same phrase. But not only do I not understand a single word he's saying, I don't even know what the overall message or emotion of the song is supposed to be! It is true of classical singing as well as for any other style: there is no need to sacrifice communication for the sake of stunning effects like this. All I hear is virtuosity. At first it's cool, then it gets boring, and you shouldn't feel bored listening to metal.
Black Sabbath - "War Pigs" (1970)
Singer: Ozzy Osbourne
This is a singer with decent diction and good musical instincts but no command of vocal technique. He is massively over-adducting his vocal folds while driving enough air through them to get them to speak, but his throat is so tight that there is no flow or resonance. His rhythmic punctuation of the lyrics is very distracting, in contrast with Singer #1 who delivered his text with rhythmic accents that served, rather than detracted from the flow of music and poetry. It hurt my throat so much to listen to him that I was tempted to ask Cosmo how long his career lasted before he either washed out or needed surgery. The entire range of his singing is contained within a single octave–with the exception of the moment when he yells "Oh Lord!" a little higher, in my opinion the only quasi-free vocal sound on the entire track.
[I felt bad when I discovered that I had given so scathing a review to this beloved pop culture icon and the only one of these five singers I had even heard of, but Cosmo assures me that such mercilessness is The Metal Way!]
Judas Priest - "Dreamer Deceiver" (1976)
Singer: Rob Halford
This singer has a fabulous range of vocal colors and effects to choose from. His diction is easy to understand and his phrasing is lovely throughout. He begins with such a high gorgeous, resonant messa di voce that I was surprised to hear how low his actual full singing voice sits once he moved into it. Clearly he had been singing with a somewhat elevated larynx when he started out so high, and later in the song when he moves into a more shrill, high sneer or a scream you can tell his larynx is in a much higher position once again. The high singing and screaming is still relatively free, but I feel that it would be even more impactful if he would master a vocal technique that would enable him to better integrate all of these different things he does so well, primarily with the goal of incorporating the depth and resonance of his natural low sound into the high stuff. He is the only one of the five who I truly wish would visit my studio some time.
I had a great time working on this post! Visit Invisible Oranges on Friday, 8/29 for Cosmo's version of my reviews.
Loved this entry! Glad it was an evaluation without knowing who sang what! Would love to see this with other genres too.
Posted by: Rachel | 07/29/2010 at 12:56 PM
Glad you enjoyed the post! Unfortunately, it would be very difficult to identify another genre of music where 1) the singing is so outrageously demanding, and 2) I am such a total neophyte!
Posted by: Claudia Friedlander | 07/29/2010 at 07:16 PM
This is SUCH an interesting post. I'm so glad someone from the opera ilk is giving a validity to what other singers do. These guys (at least in their early/living days) were playing 100+ shows per year, drinking copious amounts of who-knows-what, travelling all over the world, and rarely cancelling appearances. For those about to rock, we salute you!!
Posted by: Christinesvoice.blogspot.com | 07/29/2010 at 07:29 PM
Now I have learned from a friend that New York Times/TIme Out New York Music Critic Steve Smith (as opposed to voice teacher W. Stephen Smith) just tweeted about this post as it appears on Invisible Oranges: http://twitter.com/nightafternight. I met Steve at a classical voice recital he was reviewing a couple of years ago and had no idea that his musical tastes are so diverse.
Listen up, classical singers - the guy who's reviewing you in the NYTimes is also a savvy metal fan!
Great singing is great singing, period.
Posted by: Claudia Friedlander | 07/30/2010 at 12:44 PM
This is a really interesting post. I own albums by all of these men, and have seen all of them (with the exception of King Diamond) perform live. Even as a fan of these vocalists, I think they got off very easy here (except, perhaps, for Ozzy!) I think their true test as vocalists is how well they perform on stage. Had this post been written based on live performances I'm not so sure the same conclusions would've been drawn. As much as I enjoy these guys' music, their overall lack of technique leads to them delivering performances today that are largely far from the caliber of performances captured on these classic recordings...
But that's just my $0.02.
Posted by: James Fintel | 07/30/2010 at 12:50 PM
James, when Cosmo originally invited me to do this I asked whether he could give me live performances to critique so that I'd know I was hearing real singing vs. studio magic. It ended up not being a practical way to approach this, but I'm grateful to have comments on live vs. studio singing from someone who has actually heard most of these singers live.
Remember that the same is also true for classical singing. When you hear someone sustain an impossibly long phrase or a superhuman high note, it may in fact really have been impossible or superhuman!
It isn't always useful to compare yourself to the way a singer you admire sounds in their recordings.
Posted by: Claudia Friedlander | 07/30/2010 at 01:05 PM
Thank you for this great review. It's always interesting to find out different opinions about the metal singers I admire. I totally agree with you concerning Ozzy and his breathing during the songs. In my opinion, Bruce Dickinson is the most talented and expressive singer out of these 5, I'm in love with his variations in singing and the emotion he puts in his performance.
Thank you again and I will keep in mind most of the things you said since I'm a singer, too [not a professional though :P ]
Posted by: Spiral-out-keep-going.blogspot.com | 07/30/2010 at 04:14 PM
To James Fintel...you have the never to post a pic of you (I assume) with the late great RJDio while commenting that if Claudia were to see him live that she wouldn't think he was as great. Wow. You are speaking of a man who never cancelled a show in his professional career due to illness or fatigue. So where can we find your albums in order to critique your vocals? That's what I thought...
Claudia this was VERY entertaining, and from someone who has sang heavy metal for 20 years (not even close to the caliber of those in the article) there was plenty to take in and enjoy. THANK YOU.
Posted by: Drewcifer1015 | 08/27/2010 at 07:59 AM
You missed one singer that out performs all of these metal singers. Please check out Michael Sweet from Stryper. In particular I recommend taking a listen to "To Hell With The Devil." Michael is a high tenor, pushing close to countertenor. Listen to the high pitched scream at the end..."devil, devil, devil"...it is effortless, on pitch, and intense.
Posted by: Donald Sehulster | 08/28/2010 at 09:22 AM
Maybe you can make part 2 with another set of singers. Another possibility is to make part 2 with later recordings of the same singers and see how experience and age (and in some cases drugs and drinking) affected their singing.
Posted by: me.yahoo.com/a/bCXA60kOy4uhljumwt7iBUcEaHEgzA-- | 09/02/2010 at 10:37 AM
I would love to hear your take on Axl Rose!
Posted by: Homodachi | 09/02/2010 at 04:29 PM
I know you're probably getting a lot of suggestions, but I thought I'd suggest one myself, Rody Walker of Protest the Hero. They aren't a classic metal band, but he has a very interesting voice, with a very wide vocal range.
Here's a song by them, if you do decide to check it out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FiqvzkDwYc
Here's just the isolated vocals from the same song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVbDG6QEzv8
...and finally, here's just the vocal harmonies:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlI5oq7ow9k&feature=related
Posted by: Maria Isabel Betancur | 09/08/2010 at 08:32 PM
Hello,
I found this article great. I am a classically trained singer myself and have found that a lot of the best singers in rock and a lot of other genres are metal/hard rock vocalists.
Let me share with you a few vocalists I've come across and absolutely love their voices.
1) Geoff Tate. With the group Queensryche. Maybe had a few lessons (his aunt was a professional opera singer):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CG8TmjrHq20
2) Roy Khan. Currently with Kamelot, formerly with Conception. Actually trained opera for three years:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiLyq1QSc3Q
3) Miljenko Matijevic. With the group Steelheart:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-nyeiKk35M
:)
Posted by: Mike Rothschild | 09/09/2010 at 12:30 AM
Excellent post! It deserves the Utne Reader mention for certain. A few newer souls you may be interested in hearing are (less conventional to the US market) Seventh Wonder, and Katatonia (newer material). Both of these bands have exceptional voices in very different ways - SW has the classical voice, and Katatonia has a newer style but the tone and melodies are exceptional.
Posted by: V | 09/11/2010 at 05:54 AM
I'd love to hear an evaluation of Muse's lead singer, Matthew Bellamy. I love his voice -- I think he has a pretty incrediable range. But I read articles talking about his "breathing technique" -- he can certainly take in a lot of air and sustain notes, but his breaths are loud and gasping. Muse is one of my favorite bands no matter what, but I can't imagine how beautiful some of their music would be if Bellamy practiced real technique in his breathing.
Posted by: Hyltoncj64 | 09/24/2010 at 02:03 PM
Matt Bellamy is a classically trained singer, he does have a great voice. Very good article, Bruce Dickinson is my favourite singer. Bear in mind that as well as singing like that for 90 minutes a night, most if not all of these guys run round non-stop sweating buckets keeping the crowd in the palm of their hand.
Posted by: Twaddlefish.wordpress.com | 10/03/2010 at 01:18 PM
While I'm an opera fan, I know little of the technical disciplines involved, but have always been impressed with Steven Tyler of Aerosmith. I expect his technique is lousy but boy can he emote, and project.
Posted by: proscriptus | 10/20/2010 at 10:39 AM
And it's probably Dio, ever the considerate gentleman, ever eager to learn, who you would most have enjoyed having in your studio (he died a few months ago). You might be interested to know he got his start in do-wop in the late Fifties. He was offered, but declined, a scholarship to Julliard c. 1960, thanks not to his voice but his trumpet playing. Imagine where he might have ended up had he taken that path!
Posted by: proscriptus | 10/20/2010 at 10:46 AM
Like others, I'd welcome a second installation of this article!
I'd be really interested in what you might have to say about, for example David Draiman of Disturbed. While they're not often my cup of tea, he does seem (to my very uneducated ear) to have some real vocal talent tucked away. Likewise, it'd be interesting to hear your thoughts on Linkin Park's Chester Bennington, who has a bizarre duality oscillating between very pretty vocals and a fierce growl.
Another direction might be to consider Hip-Hop artists who can actually sing - and believe me, I struggle to see past much of the detritus that passes for R&B now. I think there's more than the average level of vocal skill with Mary J. Blige and Ne-Yo, for example.
Posted by: Robodaniel | 10/26/2010 at 05:22 PM
Responding late to this, but I just wanted to mention that I saw Dio perform at what unfortunately was one of his final live shows and the man was almost perfect in his performance (as was the band's as a whole). Maybe he strained once toward the very end but only for a moment. Otherwise, his performance was almost indistinguishable from the studio albums.
I also saw Dickinson on Iron Maiden's most recent U.S. tour and he likewise was excellent live, although maybe not nearly so much as Dio because Bruce likes to run, climb, and leap full blast all over the stage while singing. His energy as a frontman has to be seen to be believed.
Posted by: Andy Sheets | 11/03/2010 at 02:17 PM
Also late to the discussion, but I'd love to hear what you think about Serj Tankien from System of a Down's voice. To my untutored ear he seems to have an incredible range and control.
Posted by: Fred-bear | 11/07/2010 at 05:49 AM
Very interesting article! I'm a classical singer with a penchant for metal St this touched a chord with me. I urge you to look at some of the European groups, many of whom are classically trained and create outstanding music. Hansi, arjen lucassen, therion, are all exquisite examples. Therion is an operatic metal choir! Arjen creates story based albums with the best talent he can find and then creates music that takes my breath away, and hansi, well, hansi is a singer for hire but mostly works with his band blind guardian and has one of the most magnificent voices. He has also worked on an ayreon album with arjen.
Posted by: Minxdragon | 02/22/2011 at 07:01 PM
I comment as one who knows Dr. Friedlander personally:
You had asked once what the role of a "producer" is in pop music, and I can offer a new answer: The role of a producer is to put the lie to any and all of your critiques of these *studio* recordings. And in this aspect of their role, they are operating arm-in-arm as accomplice with the tracking engineer and/or the mix engineer.
You see, if there's one thing I learned from studying Music Production & Engineering at Berklee, it's that you can't trust a single thing you hear on these tracks, if you're listening with the ear of a live performer. One of the very first things they taught us to do, before they got into any new-fangled digital wizardry, was how to edit analog tape with a good-ol' razor blade. (I have to wonder if they still do that, since it was already ludicrously outdated when they made me put isopropyl alcohol on my fingers.) One of the points of this was to demonstrate that Editing has been an art form and a powerful tool in the producer/engineer's bag for decades. Ain't nothing new.
If you ever run across someone who does production or engineering in a modern studio, ask them what "comp" means. It's not short for "complimentary", but for "compilation". It's been around far longer than digital audio, though now it's exponentially easier than when some of these albums were made. What it means in the end is that you can't be sure that what you're hearing in the attack and in the release *of the same note* was even recorded *on the same day*. Because these guys have no qualms about slicing the holy bejeezus out of their several-dozen takes to get a vocal performance that will sell records, whether the performer can back it up live or not.
Hopefully, if the producer has some notion of "artistic integrity", the performance you hear on the album is not that different from the performance you will hear in the arena. And given the fame of these artists, I think that's not a losing bet. But, in the final balance, the only judgment of vocal performance you can really, really trust is one you hear with your own ears straight from their mouths. Preferably with no electric reinforcement system that could be masking a lip-synch.
(No, I swear I didn't just accuse Ronnie James Dio of lip-synching. R.I.P., Dio, seriously. I don't need that little bastard haunting me.)
Posted by: Lucas Hardy | 10/28/2011 at 01:14 AM
Hello, Claudia.
I love your site!
It would be great if I could get your take on my vocals. If you have time, it would be great.
https://myspace.com/thedeependofthepool/music/song/one-frantic-moment-20802572-20603757
Thank you.
James.
Posted by: D | 08/30/2015 at 02:31 PM
8 years have passed and I still hope you do a follow up to this article! I'd love to know what you'd say about Bruce Dickinson in his middle ages - and live on stage! It's so rare to listen to a rock singer that actually gets much better with the passing of the decades. I would also like to know your opinion on a better song by King Diamond ('Abigail' or 'Uninvited Guest', for instance, which are songs you can clearly get that they tell a story, with multiple characters and perspectives - and also they are better produced and sound more clearly). I agree King Diamond is not the best singer ever, but I still like him. It's always fun to listen to him.
I'm a huge fan of Halford in his early years. His singing and song writing features a declamation qualitily without losing the melody (King Diamond, which also does declamation a lot, usually cannot sing really melodically unless he goes into falsetto, which explains why he is always "shifting gears"). Because of such quality, whenever I listen to Rob, it is like he is addressing the words of the song directly to me. I wish he had taken better care of his voice when he was younger.
Judas Priest, for a brief period of time, had a singer, Tim Owens, that was actually more technical than Halford, but he used most of his technique to sound like Halford (he was chosen because of his work in a Judas Priest cover band, just like Arnel Pineda's cover work led him to Journey). He's voice was lower than Halford's, probably a baritone, I guess.
If you ever do another review like this, consider reviewing Geoff Tate (Queensrÿche). Chances are you already listened to at least one of his songs, Silent Lucidity, which was a hit beyond rock charts. I've always read he is a baritone, although I could never attest that since he is most of the time soaring high, but when he goes deep down, it's even more impressive. (And since I'm a case of the inverse myself, being mislabeled a baritone in the beginning, I'm never confident to say what other singers are.)
Cheers!
Cris Oliveira
Posted by: Cris Oliveira | 02/10/2018 at 11:14 AM